Re: Wide_[Wide_]Character

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

> RM 3.5.2 talks about "code positions" (=code points, I guess),
represented
> by Wide_Wide_Character. From this I conclude that it shall be UCS-4 with
> some implementation-defined endianness.

Code points can be represented by any set of encodings. Wide_Character 
seems to deliberately confine itself to the BMP, so UCS-2 would suffice 
(and seems implied).

I can't see any implication that would cause me to think 
Wide_Wide_Character is definitely UCS-4 (and not UTF-16).

Dale

-- 
dstanbro@[EMAIL PROTECTED]