Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Ada > limited types (...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 26 Topic 4222 of 5828
Post > Topic >>

limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)

by Thierry Bernier <email@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 24, 2006 at 04:51 PM

Stephen Leake <stephe_on_the_web@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote : 

> If we implemented points as limited private types, we wouldn't be

Please do not.
limited is like the flu : a record containing a limited field must be 
limited itself.
For example, you can not extend a Gtk.Window.Gtk_Window_Type with an 
extension containing a limited type, or else the root of these types must 
be limited (and I don't own it).

limited should be used only when the type is really limited (when using 
accesses, tasks, etc).

Disagrees ?
--
Thierry Bernier
 




 26 Posts in Topic:
limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
Thierry Bernier <email  2006-02-24 16:51:03 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Randy Brukardt"  2006-02-24 15:57:46 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
Matthew Heaney <matthe  2006-02-25 02:21:13 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
Matthew Heaney <matthe  2006-02-25 03:38:59 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2006-02-25 12:06:20 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
Matthew Heaney <matthe  2006-02-25 15:05:02 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Randy Brukardt"  2006-02-25 19:01:06 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2006-02-26 10:00:07 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
Matthew Heaney <matthe  2006-02-26 18:20:39 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2006-02-26 21:52:32 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
Matthew Heaney <matthe  2006-02-26 22:07:00 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2006-02-27 10:11:28 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus  2006-02-27 15:34:58 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2006-02-27 17:05:47 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Matthew Heaney"  2006-02-27 08:52:23 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2006-02-27 21:21:08 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus  2006-02-27 22:40:18 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2006-02-28 10:38:31 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Matthew Heaney"  2006-02-27 15:00:29 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2006-02-28 10:39:20 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Matthew Heaney"  2006-02-28 09:24:35 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2006-02-28 20:06:50 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Matthew Heaney"  2006-02-28 11:58:11 
Re: limited types (Was: Records that could be arrays)
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2006-02-28 22:03:37 
Re: limited types
Simon Wright <simon@[E  2006-02-28 21:51:52 
Re: limited types
Matthew Heaney <matthe  2006-03-01 01:59:16 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 17:45:51 CDT 2008.