santosh wrote:
>
> How are we expected to understand your private language. It's bad
> enough that there are several x86 assemblers with incompatible
> syntaxes, even with regards to basic instructions, without having to
> know the "hobby" languages of every Tom, Dick & Harry.
Actually, what he is doing is a "stealth" way of getting people used to
seeing the language. Of course, until there is a decent user manual and
tutorial on using the language, people are going to be of little help.
In any case, I remember Jim Neil doing a similar thing with Terse many,
many, years ago. Though rather than asking synthesized question, Jim
actually answered people's assembly language questions in Terse and
then also provided the MASM output from Terse (for those who couldn't
read Terse). I thought that was an excellent approach for spreading the
news about his assembly language.
Cheers,
Randy Hyde
|
