Re: CPU type idea

On Jul 21, 11:08=A0pm, "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On Jul 21, 1:53 pm, "Wolfgang Kern" <nowh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Alexei A. Frounze mentioned:
>
> > > Interfierence of binary signals is considered as erreanous in
> > > > the digital world. There is no way to recover the original info.
> > > Not necessarily true. There exist things like error correcting codes
> > > and forward error correction:
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_correcting_codes
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_error_correction
>
> > Yes, there were also noise-tolerant codes for magnetic tapes
> > like Manchester and other selfclocking streamer formats.
>
> > But I see an error in terms of what the OP had in mind with a
> > deliberate mix of binary signals to produce something useful ...
>
> Well, in digital signal processing you can get something useful out of
> mixing digital signals. Examples:
> - signal filtration
> - modulation/demodulation
> - signal detection/recognition through correlation
> Perhaps there's more to it.
>
> Alex

I thought I had an amazing idea thinking a CPU can work this way...

isn't there any example of an effect over the distrance of travel that
culminates two signals for example into another expression of what the
signal is?

just to see the changing effect be a tangent of the signal sent.. not
just signal, anything...

ultrasound in a water bath oughta do too, like, send sound that
vibrates the water and builds together a waveform that is effect of
the sound.. so give sound that vibrates like to know the sound for how
it vibrates, then send sound that you say is a math operation and
expect somewhere in the water for there to be an answer.