Re: cpu type idea

On Jul 18, 5:50=A0am, "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2:37 am, mcja...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 18, 5:15 am, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Chuck Crayne <ccra...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> > > > On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > mcja...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> > > >> don't two signals together come out to be something else with
what
> > > >> they carry on about in the air?
>
> > > > Yes. This technique is called "heterodyning", and has been used in
> > > > radio transmitting and receiving for many years. However, it is an
> > > > analogue process, and doesn't apply to digital computer chips.
>
> > > Except in corner cases, signals come together additively.
> > > Heterodying's multiplicative. So that can't be what he's
> > > gibbering on about surely. However, given that he's barely
> > > intelligible, be might be talking about cake recipes, so
> > > anything's possible.
>
> > > Phil
> > > --
> > > Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all.
> > > -- Microsoft voice recognition live demonstration
>
> > I bet across a spectrum two signals ought to say more than nothing for
> > how you can saw a few bits in the signal work through.
> > A very difficult pro****tion of the way two signals can work each other
> > to not say anything that doesn't demonstrate some work being done.
>
> > I'd like to point the =A0idea of how an almost dead fluorescent
> > lightbulb flutering would send quite a difference of the way i touch
> > it on one side to the other side, maybe i can touch it math funny with
> > an equal lightshow on the other end?
>
> If you're interested in how things really work, go and study physics
> and signal processing. That'll be tough, but give you pretty good
> understanding of the processes underlying the various effects and
> fenomena and let you use those as building blocks for the new stuff,
> whatever you wish or happen to invent. At the same time it will allow
> you to think and communicate in the same language with other engineers
> and scientists. What you're saying now is indeed pretty unintelligible
> because you don't operate with the generally accepted terms/
> definitions and you know way too little. Basically, you're
> fantasizing, dreaming of something that you can't explain let alone
> understand. Just study the stuff.
>
> Alex- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

what is it that makes two sparks fly together, is it seeing another
spark move nearby ?

i saw it move in a funny direction that seems to be computing another
angle, because a field built up around it that doesn't wave the right
of way, but gives an answer to how something inbetween can avoid
contract to what doesn't attract it.

why can't it find the light of day to open it up to a better
suggestion of how to stay grounded? is it because a flatline drains
the highest reach ?