On May 15, 7:58=A0pm, Evenbit <nbaker2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 15, 12:28 pm, "rh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <rh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > HLA nails Mac OS X sup****t in its quest to become the most bloated
> > > assembler on the planet.
>
> > Interesting comment. As HLA v1.102 is both a bit smaller and a bit
> > faster than the HLA v1.101 release. :-)
>
> I figure-in the do***entation size in my "bloat" calculations. =A0:)
IOW, if an assembler doesn't have any do***entation, it has less
"bloat" than an assembler that does.
:-)
Seriously, I'd figured you were counting the test suite for HLA, which
is quite large at this point. Then again, having lots of code in the
test suite, like having lots of do***entation, is considered a good
thing.
hLater,
Randy Hyde
|
