On Aug 31, 5:13=A0pm, ah <splifing...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Peter Hucker wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:39:36 +0100, ah <splifing...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> Peter Hucker wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:49:34 +0100, ah <splifing...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
> >>>> Peter Hucker wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:30:20 +0100, ah <splifing...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrot=
e:
>
> >>>>>> Craig Oldfield wrote:
> >>>>>>> "ah" <splifing...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>news:48a622f0$0$11740$892e0abb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>> Craig Oldfield wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> Neil knows what he meant. He would tell you himself but he has
=
had to
> >>>>>>>>> visit
>
> >>>>>>>> If e dinnae stoap acting like a big jessy ah'll hit im wi that
h=
auf brick
> >>>>>>>> again.
>
> >>>>>>>>> his hairdresser Richard this evening. (Richard is over 21.)
>
> >>>>>>>> That hogbeast?! =A0Ah thoat e give im his jotters?
>
> >>>>>>> This makes as much sense as your dollar post.
>
> >>>>>> Are ye daft?
>
> >>>>> Affirmative.
>
> >>>> ye =3D=3D yew =3D=3D yah;// ye !=3D he !=3D hir
>
> >>> Geek.
>
> >> Lies.
>
> > Well why are you speaking like that?
>
> Making a statement a fact?
> --
> ah
Cowards best not post too much here!
|
